Cut from very much the same cloth as In Bruges, The Guard simultaneously feels both welcomingly familiar and delightfully humorous. Despite its obvious shared focus on dark humour and sharp, witty dialogue this lazy, albeit complimentary comparison only acts as a disservice to a film which impressively manages to mould its own unique identity out of an increasingly formulaic genre.
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
Talihina Sky: The Story of Kings of Leon ★☆☆☆☆
Music documentaries are often seen as an incredibly subjective strand of filmmaking. However, there have been occasions when the genre has managed to produce films which overcome the potentially alienating trappings of their subject matter and attract a wider audience than just those who religiously buy the records of the bands being distastefully thrust in front of the camera in order to acquire more royalties
Monday, 27 June 2011
Turin Horse ★★★★★
This Berlinale silver bear winner is rumoured to be Bela Tarr’s directorial swansong. Turin Horse is a deeply personal and philosophical film that masterfully uses the impoverished and desolate backdrop of the Hungarian countryside to take us on a harrowingly bleak journey through six days of spiralling despair and misery.
Saturday, 25 June 2011
On the Shore ★★☆☆☆
Nice is renowned around the world for the elegance of its coast line and the glamorous hotels and restaurants which gloriously overflow with a clientele of irreproachable financial sway. A seemingly bizarre setting then for a harrowingly amplified literal voyage into the spiralling level of madness loneliness and unrequited love can lead to.
Albatross ★★★☆☆
This nuanced coming of age drama embodies everything that independent British Cinema has recently become famous for. A combination of homely humour, eccentric relationships and a gritty underbelly of the social implications of the class divide make the corner stone of this much loved yet increasingly predictable format. All three of the aforementioned ingredients are present within Albatross however, this quintessentially British movie somehow manages to transform itself into a film which despite its generic and creatively suffocating approach to filmmaking is hard not to become besotted with.
Wednesday, 22 June 2011
Rabies ★★★★☆
If you go down to the woods today you’re in for a big surprise...
The pretty girls and boys visiting this secluded woodland could never have imagined the madness they were in store for and neither will you as Rabies violently breaks all the conventions of the slasher genre whilst simultaneously executing all the most successful scare techniques from every critically revered horror film of the last century.
Troll Hunter ★★★★☆
Choosing to take the well trodden ‘found footage’ path that has over the last decade slowly become a recognized sub category of both the horror and thriller genres, The Troll Hunter is difficult not to describe as a more farcical Blair Witch Project or adrenaline fueled Catfish. Indeed there’s plenty of shaky camera shots as our protagonists run in fear combined with close ups of scared faces to at first make you feel like you’re observing a carbon copy of these cheaply made shock pieces. However, the instant we’re thrust into the depths of Troll Hunters gloriously exhilarating venture into the mythical Norwegian wilderness it becomes instantly clear that this lazy journalistic stereotyping would be a total disservice to what is a uniquely creative, tongue in check, piece of lovingly assured film making.
King of Devil's Island ★★★☆☆
King of Devil’s Island is a wonderful example of how even the ugliest of events can be the basis of something beautiful. Based on real life accounts from Bastoy, a Norwegian reform school for maladjusted young boys (which continued to operate well into the middle of the twentieth century), this tense thriller is stepped within layer upon layer of human tragedy.
Phase 7 ★★☆☆☆
As the apocalypse dawns a couple begin to have a few problems with their neighbours.
During a national epidemic Coco and his pregnant wife must stay locked in their apartment, quarantined until it’s deemed safe to leave. There seems little need to panic though as the fridge is fully stocked and there’s plenty of entertainment at home. However, as the days unwind and the contagious virus appears to be unstoppable the patience of some of the buildings more paranoid and unstable residents begin to diminish amongst the escalating chaos occurring outside. It leads to a series of events that few of them could have previously anticipated and none of them will ever forget.
The Last Circus ★★★★★
Directed by renowned surrealist Alex de la Iglesia, The Last Circus throws us straight into the action when a circus performance in Madrid is interrupted by the sound of gunfire and explosives. All the men in the audience are pulled out and forced to fight, this includes the performers, notably one of the shows bedraggled clowns who despite his opposition is thrust into this bloody conflict against general Franco’s advancing armies. The carnage which ensues would be enough to titillate even the most extreme cinema fan’s but throw in a clown dressed in drag, wielding a machete, and the excitement scale burst uncontrollably under the weight of its own absurdity.
Calvet ★★★★★
After a terrifying journey to hell and back Jean Marc Calvet must now faces his biggest demon. After rising from the ashes of a life shrouded in paranoia this now famous artist must embark on a harrowing voyage back through his troubled past in order to find the son he abandoned almost eighteen years ago in this brave and thoroughly touching documentary.
Bombay Beach ★★☆☆☆
Bombay Beach focuses on a small American community inhabiting the remains of a once prosperous holiday town which is now nothing more than a trace memory of better times. Acting as an insightful journey into the real core of natural human behaviour each of the townsfolk we’re presented with has their own entrancing back story and unique way to survive amongst what is now little more that an isolated dust bowl of a town.
Monday, 20 June 2011
Arriety ★★★★☆
Much loved by adults and children alike, Studio Ghibli’s contribution to the world of cinema has so far been a continually welcomed dose of adult friendly childhood fantasy, which, continues to accelerate beyond the now seemingly redundant benchmark Disney had previously set for hand-drawn animation. Last year’s Ponyo managed to mesmerise audiences with its charming retelling of Hans Christian Andersen’s ‘The Little Mermaid’, so with Arriety similarly adapted from a much loved children’s classic (The Borrowers) it would be fair to say that expectations are high...
Saturday, 11 June 2011
Jack Goes Boating ★★★☆☆
American Independent cinema has, over the last decade, built an image for itself based on a foundation of awkward, damaged, middle class nobodies who appear deeply disenfranchised with their seemingly mundane lives. Perhaps it’s a sign of the countries zeitgeist, both disassociating itself from the greedy upper classes who still cling to their Darwinian social stature beliefs (which died out at roughly the same time as the eighties), whilst simultaneously ignoring its worryingly high level of unemployment and the ever increasing wealth divide...
Thursday, 9 June 2011
Rabbit Hole ★★★☆☆
Cinema has always unashamedly drawn its inspiration from any form of narrative it can get its grubby mitts on. Unless nailed to the ground everything imaginable has by now had the cinematic treatment, from historical epics, which, remain little factual information of the events they portray, to adaptations of much loved literary classics that, more often than not, fail to capture the true essence of the source material in an attempt to condense everything into a sellable two hour narrative. Recently there has been a trend for a mirroring of this cultured musing between cinema and theatre. We’ve recently had stage versions of big screen favourites such as Umbrellas of Cherbourg, Ghost and the Lion King (to name but a few) whilst cinema, particularly American Independent cinema, has looked towards critically popular west end shows for moving character dramas to recreate and sell to a larger audience. Yet whilst watching a painstakingly, multi levelled film stripped down to its core in an attempt to capture it’s inner magic, purely being held together vitally by strong acting and pragmatic direction, can no doubt be a fascinating procedure to witness firsthand, the same cannot always be said for reversing the treatment.
Tuesday, 7 June 2011
Cria Cuervos ★★★★★
The best years of life are universally regarded to be those of youth; a time filled with unadulterated fun and adventure with the constraints, monotony and rigmaroles of adulthood nothing but a distant enigma. Director Carlos Saura raises a rather compelling counter argument; he believes “it’s only our memory that tells us this period was a wonderful time, but that’s only because we don’t remember things.” Although a rather pessimistic view (Saura is no doubt referring to his own traumatic childhood growing up during the Spanish civil war), there are many that would agree with him. Cria Cuervos is a delightful exploration of one girl’s traumatic journey through childhood, giving us a warts and all portrayal of the true confusion that plagues this phase instead of glorifying it through self imposed misinformed nostalgia. Using a seemingly endless series of unhappy events, Saura throws us into a time of terrible indecision, cloaked in a suffocating atmosphere of fear. Highly regarded as one of the most insightful and politically charged pieces of Spanish filmmaking, this charming journey of child fantasy imbued in reality finally gets the re-release it deserves from the BFI.
It’s still very much Francisco Franco’s Spain when we
intrude upon the Madrid household of the recently widowed Anselmo. He dies
suddenly amidst the throes of passion with Amelia, the wife of his best friend
and fellow army officer, Nicolas. However, it appears this was no natural death
– he was poisoned! The apparent culprit of this calculated murder? None other
than the second of his three daughters, Ana (Ana Torrent, Spirit Of The
Beehive), a wise beyond her years girl who blames her father for the death of
her beloved mother. Cria Cuervos literally translates as Raise Ravens, a
Spanish proverb that reads “raise ravens and they’ll take your eyes” and is
generally used for someone who has bad luck raising children!
Out of a sense of family duty, Anselmo’s sister-in-law,
Paulina, soon moves into the large, yet moderately dilapidated house to care
for the girls and their mute grandmother, instantly instituting her own
domestic regime. The girls remain unfazed and continue with their lives in much
the same manner as before, but as their summer holiday unfolds, we become privy
not only to the family dynamic of this all woman household, but also the vivid
fantasy world of Ana. Through a myriad of daydreams and other forms of
escapism, this inquisitive, imaginative and possible deadly young girl comes to
terms with the death of her mother, whilst maintaining her staunch hatred for
her father and the oppressive regime he represented…
The most captivating element of Cria Cuervos has to be its
seamless story, which impressively blurs together fantasy and memory, whilst
maintaining a strong foothold in reality. These hauntingly vivid depictions of
Anna’s numerous flights of the imagination are beautifully conveyed as a stark
contrast to the repressed household she dwells within and the world around her.
These flashbacks, dream sequences and daytime mirages could have easily
resulted in a confusing and cluttered film, yet, through deceptively simple
shooting methods (Ana’s mother wanders into the frame nonchalantly and is
completely ignored by all except Ana), the camera work of Teodoro Escamilla
manages to capture the intimacy of these fictitious moments between Ana and her
deceased mother. This ability to let fantasy and actuality intertwine on
screen, combined with the tension created by the tentative yet relentless
movement of the camera, perfectly aligns us with Ana’s point of view. It all
culminates in not just an enjoyably honest portrayal of childhood confusion,
but a unique and exquisitely presented perspective on the gritty reality of
bereavement.
Fans of Pan’s Labyrinth’s darkly unsettling, poetic
depiction of child fantasy and fairytales, successfully mirrored against the
violent backdrop of the Spanish Civil War, will instantly fall in love with
Cria Cuervos. Both films undoubtedly share a similar thematic and stylish
template, but stand out for the astonishingly professional performances from
their young and engaging female leads. This in no way should detract from the
enjoyment of both these films, but instead underlines how effective depicting
sensitive adult themes through immature eyes can be. However, unlike Pan’s
Labyrinth’s heroine, Ofilia, a young girl who radiated with childlike
innocence, Ana Torrent’s performance is so frighteningly serious that you can’t
help but believe that she’s more than capable of the most malevolent of acts.
This, however, is a role which demands a broader range of emotion responses
than your usual pedophobia thriller, yet Torrent’s expressive and incredibly
watchful face never falters in portraying any of these.
The film was made whilst General Franco was on his deathbed,
and was naturally seen as a metaphor for the last dying gasps of fascism and
the dictator’s totalitarian regime. The film clearly stresses the disparity
between Ana’s fantasy world and the political reality of fascism though
numerous symbolic techniques. The house, whilst clearly quite grand, feels
incredibly claustrophobic, and it can be no coincidence that the blinds on the
windows seem like prison bars containing the girls from the outside world. The
empty swimming pool in the garden, which the girls play around, could also
represent the lost pleasures of the era or, indeed, their unfulfilled lives.
Ana’s father, in his military attire, is evidently here to represent fascism
within the family dynamic. His controlling nature over Ana’s mother (a once
famed concert pianist) could easily be interpreted as the repression of artists
such as Saura, making Ana’s murderous act seem almost revolutionary within this
domestic microcosm. Unfortunately, the introduction of Paulina to rule the
home, with her strict code of cleanliness and etiquette, seems to act as a
warning that Spain’s transition toward democracy may not be as smooth as hoped
for.
Paulina’s presence turns the home into an all female
household that spans three generations; each is represented with its own
distinctive soundtrack. The disparity between the girls’ incredibly catchy pop
music and the classical music, which seemingly once filled the house, shows a
shift away from tradition, which is equally apparent in their casual clothing –
a stark contrast to the elegant dresses of their elders. It has led to many
perceiving that Saura uses the female sex and their legacy of repression as a
parallel to Spain’s troubled history. It’s a tenuous link, but the fact remains
that many feminists still laud Cria Cuervos as a wonderfully subtle account of
female socialization, specifically the way in which the girls reject the roles
they are expected to fulfill. Ana’s interactions with Rosa, the maid, lead to
some humorous and well crafted examples of this, but perhaps the dress up
scene, involving the three girls recreating a domestic dispute, is the most
obviously symbolic of them all. It’s a scene that we later realise, through one
of Ana’s recollections, is an almost exact copy of an argument between her
broken down mother and nauseatingly abhorrent father. Yet, in this delightfully
charming recreation by the children, Ana’s portrayal of her mother is a far
more assured and confrontational one, perhaps signalling a time of hope
regarding women’s rights through this new rebellious generation, brought up
within a new liberated Spain. It’s a subject matter dealt with cautiously by
the director, who despite these countless depictions of youthful empowerment
presents the future Ana (though some gently interspersed, straight to camera
pieces) under an impartial light. Interestingly, Saura casts the same actress
here as plays Ana’s mother, leading us to question whether young Ana is doomed
to make the same mistakes.
The term ‘classic’ often gets thrown around too easily,
without much regard to the importance and role of the adjective within
cinematic history. Cria Cuervos, with its cultivated meditation on history,
memory and childhood, combined with an intriguing political undertone, is a
film which can be enjoyed on many, many levels. Whether you choose to view it
as a reflective parable documenting the fall of fascism, a subtle allegory
about the repressed roles of women, or just as a joyous journey into the
fantasy world of an imaginative young girl, it rightfully deserves to be
heralded as a true classic.
Brotherhood ★★☆☆☆
Winner of Best Film at the Rome International Film Festival, Brotherhood’s tale of Danish neo-Nazis arrives on DVD conveniently amidst the recent controversy surrounding Denmark’s most famed director, Lars Von Trier, and his Hitler ‘slip up’ at the Cannes Film Festival. Indeed, the issue of fascism is somewhat of a hot topic currently and, as the recession spreads across Europe, there is a genuine concern regarding the movement of disenfranchised voters to the far right and the growing popularity of excessively nationalistic political groups. However, Brotherhood is more than a story about extremist views – it’s a desolate tale about love and identity.
Danish serviceman, Lars is denied the promotion he’s been
striving for due to recent allegations about drunken passes he’s allegedly made
towards male subordinates. Disgraced, he returns home and moves back in with
his parents, who seem curious as to his sudden return and take little time or
thought before pressurising him into re-enlisting.
On one seemingly typical evening, whilst catching up with
old friends, Lars encounters two members of a local neo-Nazi group. One of
these men (Fatty) is a high ranking member of the organisation who takes an
instant shine to Lars, despite his eloquently voiced dissent towards their
violent tactics. He senses Lars is a promising young man, angry at the world,
lost and in need of a new direction – all the ingredients necessary in a
potential new recruit, and Lars quickly disregards his previous moral high
ground in search of a feeling of belonging.
When Lars provokingly admits to an assault of a local
immigrant, carried out as part of his initiation, his parents quickly expel him
from the family home, forcing him to find refuge elsewhere. Ultimately, this
action submerges Lars further into this dark underworld of violence and
ignorance, leaving him little option but to accept the warm hospitality of
Fatty.
Lars ends up living with Jimmy, a highly respected member of
the crew, complete with numerous swastika tattoos and the stereotypical shaved
head and muscular build of a radical racist. The two men’s relationship begins
with much hostility but soon moves to grudging admiration, friendship and
eventually passion, as they become intimate lovers. Their forbidden romance
goes completely against the doctrines of their gang and they must quickly come
to terms with what will happen to them once they’re exposed…
This marriage of love and violence is largely achieved
through a stirring use of non-diegetic sound and elegant camera work. Scenes of
violence or heightened ‘manliness’ are softened with lilting strings and
ambient music, which seems to whisk us out of this vile and boorish world. The
cleverly angled shots and use of soft lighting create a warm, painterly
backdrop from which we can comfortably view these occasionally disturbing
events. With the film’s rough edges gently sanded down for us, we’re joyously
prevented from feeling too close or too far apart from this gritty, suffocating
atmosphere of fear and exacerbated masculinity. Reversely, at the few crucial
moments where a clear depiction of these violent scenes is necessary to further
advance the plot, the raw energy and anger is freely allowed to pour out of the
screen. This harsh contrast in tone, when used sparingly, certainly makes what
we witness more effective and poignant than a full blown assault on our senses
could’ve achieved.
As previously mentioned, the film acts to mirror the growing
concerns about the rise of far right ‘political’ parties throughout Europe.
It’s an issue which affects a wide audience; however, the film does little to
highlight the true problems of this political shift other than showcase its
existence. The underhand techniques and propaganda used to prey on the weak and
fragile in an attempt to recruit new members are never really investigated, and
the true extent of their calculated crimes against ethnic minorities never
properly exposed, other than a couple of beatings shown here and there.
We’re curiously introduced to the upper echelons of this
party, but their roles are never really clarified, other than teasingly short
glimpses of how this is an operation controlled from a much more respectable
and highly regarded position than the underground bars and clubs we’re privy
to. Further scrutinising of the worryingly organised administrations running
these groups, whom it appears are far more than just random foot soldiers,
would have created a much more haunting social warning.
Comparisons with American History X are inevitable, as both
films deal with the search for identity within a conformist, right winged,
regime. Yet, unfortunately, the most striking similarity between the two is the
incredibly unbelievable journey of redemption their central characters take.
Jimmy’s story seems far too contrived to resonate effectively with the viewer,
and his violent actions further prevent us from feeling any compassion towards
him and his new found vulnerability. His character is far too black-and-white –
at one time seeming like the archetypal nihilistic skin head (the first to
violently attack someone or call them a “faggot”), before instantly
transforming into a soft and caring homosexual man who seems to feel compassion
for Lars, despite the eight inch Iron cross permanently etched onto his chest.
It’s this lack of any emotional middle ground or proper depiction of his
transition from ‘bad’ to ‘good’ which prevents us from caring about his
character. The few attempts there are to remedy his two dimensional appearance
are only ever slightly touched upon; for instance, the back-story concerning
his drug addled younger brother, whom he takes under his wing, is never
expanded upon and is left to linger in the periphery of the narrative. His
overall lack of depth makes these negligible actions seem ever so redundant (as
if solely injected into the narrative at the last minute to make Jimmy seem
more human and his journey to redemption more believable).
To a lesser extent, the same problems exist when trying to
identify with Lars. Although we see most of the events through his eyes, it’s
never clearly explained why he would chose to join such an extremist group when
his own sexuality and apparent disinterest in their violent methods surely
distances himself from their beliefs. He never seems to fit in with this
incredibly violent and overtly masculine group and thus always looks like an
outsider, making his inevitable outing and the accompanying shock and anger
from his newly adopted peers seem mildly ludicrous considering the numerous
visually obvious disparities between himself and them.
As a representation of the zeitgeist surrounding European
politics, Brotherhood succeeds in portraying the types of groups we fear are
currently operating within Europe and the violent methods they use to express
their beliefs. However, the film seems to lack a defined audience with the
central storyline of sexual confusion and lost identity ultimately feeling
artificial and manufactured, looking like little more than a device implemented
to represent the political confusion of the times without any real thought as
to how plausible this amalgamation of two seemingly polar opposite subjects
would come across. Some strong performances and technical nuances prevent this
confused film from becoming unwatchable (almost managing to cover up the
numerous plot holes), but it’s what’s missing from the film which is ultimately
its undoing, making it surprisingly toothless and, in turn, completely
forgettable.
Saturday, 4 June 2011
Senna ★★★★★
On 1st May 1994, the sporting world lost one of its most charismatic and well-loved personalities in an accident which would resonate around the world. Travelling at a perilous 130mph, Ayrton Senna crashed his Williams-Renault Formula One car into the now infamous Tamburello corner of the San Marino Grand Prix. The collision led to a piece of his suspension flying off the nose of the car and making a devastatingly fatal blow to his helmet. It followed a similar incident during the previous days qualifying heats when Austrian driver Rolan Ratzenberger slammed into the same wall and died instantly. Yet there remains something so endearing, so mesmerising about this flamboyant Brazilian that whilst both their bodies may have been regrettably swept of the track on that fateful spring weekend, Senna’s spirit continues to live on amongst the public consciousness.
Director Asif Kapadia’s documentary of this fallen celebrity
focuses on Ayrton Senna’s decade competing in Formula One. We follow his
journey from lowly debutant driver for Toelman through his rapid rise up the
Formula One Ladder, from Lotus to McLaren (winning the world championship an
impressive three times) and, finally, with team Williams, where he would
abruptly end his racing career.
We witness his struggles on the track against McLaren team
mate and fierce rival Alain Prost (a sideshow which undoubtedly created an
unparalleled buzz around a sport not normally followed for its personal
confrontations), to the off track world of rigid politics, advanced motoring
technology and ludicrous financial endorsements that many, including Senna,
believe removed any true sense of competitiveness from the sport long ago.
However, Senna isn’t a documentary about Formula One but
rather an intimate portrait of a global superstar who staunchly stuck to his
views and refused to play by anyone else’s rules. A humble celebrity who
remained fiercely patriotic and charitable to his impoverished homeland, and
stood not only as a spokesman for his sport, but an ambassador for everything a
celebrity should be…
The film’s most significant achievement has to be the vast
range of footage that director Kapadia has managed to lay his hands on
(impressively convincing Bernie Ecclestone to open the private video vaults of
the Formula One archives). From intimate family films to on board driver
cameras, the depth of material on show invites us into not just the
professional side of Senna’s life but also his private world. Like the most
intricate jigsaw puzzle, it’s all wonderfully and lovingly pieced together to
create a seamless flow between scenes, making the viewer feel more a part of
the story than simply a fly on the wall. We witness the hard work Senna put
into helping poor Brazilian children, the close knit, down to earth family unit
he would escape to, and his constant professional conflicts regarding the
political bureaucracy of his sport.
Unlike your archetypal sporting documentary, Senna has no
single narrator, instead using personal testimonies sparingly with the majority
of the film’s story being told by Senna himself from archived sound bites, press
conferences and interviews. It gives the film a haunting quality, which creates
an existential aroma around it, making the viewer feel like they’re on an
incredibly personal journey with this fascinating and deeply spiritual man.
There’s also none of the clichéd ‘talking head’ segments we’re used to from
such documentaries, which often interrupt a film’s flow and inject too many
external and often contradictory opinions. Instead, we are very much left to
make our own opinions, deciding on our view of this racing car driver purely
from witnessing his work and hearing him speak, as opposed to being dictated by
what others say about him. This touchingly honest approach is achieved not
through the director’s sure-handed guidance, but from Senna himself. Rarely are
we presented with such a humble, shy but equally entertaining sports man – a
man who clearly loves what he does far more than the fame and money that often
accompanies (and corrupts this kind of monumental sporting success). This
provides us with an opportunity to witness his contagiously optimistic and
passionate personality as it positively radiates out from the screen.
There are many who believe this approach to documentary
filmmaking is unnecessarily intrusive and crosses the line of personal privacy.
The final twenty-five minutes of the film focuses on the inevitable ending –
the incident of the San Marino Grand Prix. It has been argued that we could
have been spared the in-car footage of Senna’s final moments, with many seeing
this as an invasive, personal intrusion that leans towards gross voyeurism.
However, this is a complement to the film’s ability to propel us into Senna’s
world, making us susceptible to the full emotive force of this tragic accident
– it makes this unfortunate outcome as powerfully upsetting as it was all those
years ago.
The second act’s focus on Senna’s fierce rivalry with former
team mate Alain Prost adds a whole other dimension to the blue print of this
documentary, creating a thrilling tale about professional jealousy and conflict
between two highly driven, competitive men at the top of their profession.
Prost, however, is not our central antagonist, rather an example of how the
political game of Formula One should be played. The main villain depicted here
is Jean Marie Balestre, the then chief of Formula One. His constant struggles
with Ayrton reveal him to be our classic pantomime baddie and their negatively
charged relationship drives the narrative forward. This attention to the
dramatic sideshow surrounding Senna’s career turns what could have been a
painfully formulaic sports documentary into something more akin to a biopic,
which, for a little while, creates a whole new narrative that pulls us deeper
into this highly secretive world, successfully capturing the pomp and political
circumstances of the sport.
The film’s pace is dictated by two important factors, music
and editing, which, throughout the movie, combine harmoniously to catalyse the
film’s emotional core. Considering the subject matter, the film had to feel fast,
full of adrenaline and most importantly exciting – something modern coverage of
the sport has failed to capture. The director’s flawless editing manages to
combine these varying pieces of stock footage into a seamless collection of
shots that moves so effortlessly that the film never loses momentum, only
occasionally taking a pit stop to let us catch our breath. The music ranges
from feverish Brazilian bossanova to frantic hand drums and all the way to
ambient strings, which culminates in an emotional rollercoaster ride,
constantly creating an appropriate mood to accompany the images we’re presented
with.
This historical record of possibly the most charismatic
sportsmen of modern times manages to not only act as a snapshot documenting the
history of Formula One but transcends the sport and creates a highly emotive
drama that will speak to a wider audience than those with a vested interest in
the sport. It’s an exquisitely enjoyable journey that like Senna’s career,
feels all too brief.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)